Built to Serve, Born to Rule: Humanity’s Oldest Code

The Primate’s Return: Fascism, Collapse, and the Deep Evolutionary Script

Subtitle: What if authoritarianism, war, and sexual selection are not political anomalies, but ancient instincts encoded in the nervous system of Homo sapiens? Don’t worry this is only a hypothesis… although some conclusions can be hauntingly compelling.

Introduction: A Species in Recurrence

Across human history, political collapse has reliably produced authoritarian resurgence. Empires fall, resources dwindle, populations panic, and almost inevitably—flags rise, boots march, and silver-tongued strongmen ascend. This has been treated as a political cycle, a historical pattern. But what if it’s something deeper? What if fascism, tribalism, and even genocidal cleansing are not deviations, but reversions to deeply embedded mammalian instincts? What if Homo sapiens is genetically predisposed to reboot civilization through violence?

The Expansionist Ape and the Collapse Loop

Humans have demonstrated an unparalleled ability to dominate and reshape ecosystems, a trend that has intensified from the Pleistocene epoch through the Anthropocene. This dominance has often led to cycles of overreach: periods of abundance followed by saturation, decline, and eventual collapse.​

As societies face the repercussions of ecological overshoot, characterized by the excessive consumption of resources beyond Earth’s regenerative capacity, there is a notable regression in societal structures. Complex, pluralistic, and democratic frameworks begin to erode, giving way to simplified systems emphasizing hierarchy, purity, and order. This shift can be interpreted as a reversion to primal organizational structures, where authoritarianism emerges as a default response to perceived chaos.​

Scientific References Supporting This Perspective:

1. “The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship”
   This paper discusses how human activities have driven the Earth into the Anthropocene epoch, emphasizing the need for effective planetary stewardship to prevent hostile environmental states.

2. “The Problem of Emergent Human Nature and Civilization Collapse”
   The article posits that civilizations tend to expand until they collapse, suggesting an inherent behavioral pattern in human societies.

3. “Understanding Social Hierarchies: The Neural and Psychological Foundations of Status”
   This review explores how human and non-human primates rapidly form social hierarchies, highlighting traits associated with status and dominance.

4. “The Concept of the Anthropocene”
   The article introduces the Anthropocene as a new geological epoch marked by significant human impact on Earth’s systems.

5. “Spread of the Cycles: A Feedback Perspective on the Anthropocene”
   This study examines how reinforcing feedback cycles have propelled humanity into the Anthropocene, suggesting the need for shifts to sustainable practices.

6. “The Collapse of Complex Societies”
   This work analyzes historical instances of societal collapse, attributing them to diminishing returns on complexity and resource overuse.

7. “Holocene Extinction”
   The entry details the ongoing mass extinction event caused by human activities, emphasizing the accelerated loss of biodiversity.

8. “Societal Collapse”
   This overview discusses various factors leading to the fall of complex human societies, including environmental and economic pressures.

9. “Ecological Overshoot”
   The article explains the phenomenon where human demands exceed the Earth’s regenerative capacity, leading to environmental degradation.

10. “Planetary Boundaries”
    This framework outlines limits to human-induced changes on Earth systems, beyond which there is a risk of catastrophic environmental change.

These references collectively underscore the patterns of human ecological dominance, the resultant societal shifts in times of resource scarcity, and the potential for regression into authoritarian structures as a response to perceived chaos.

The Limbic Appeal of Fascist Aesthetics

Fascist regimes have historically harnessed potent aesthetic elements—such as uniforms, salutes, slogans, orchestrated marches, and emblematic banners—to evoke deep-seated emotional responses. These components resonate with the human limbic system, the brain’s center for emotions and behavioral drives, by promoting order, synchrony, in-group cohesion, and dominance.​

The strategic deployment of these symbols does more than provide visual uniformity; it actively engages neurological pathways. For instance, synchronized group activities and standardized attire can stimulate mirror neurons, fostering a sense of unity and shared purpose. Additionally, such collective experiences may trigger the release of oxytocin, a hormone associated with social bonding and trust, thereby deepening allegiance to the group and its ideologies.​

This deliberate aestheticization serves to bypass rational analysis, appealing directly to instinctual and emotional faculties. The visceral satisfaction derived from the order and unity presented by fascist aesthetics underscores the challenge in confronting and disassembling such ideologies.​

Scientific References Supporting This Perspective:

1. “The Role of Emotions in Nazi Propaganda”
   This study examines how Nazi propaganda utilized visual symbols and slogans to evoke emotions like hatred, fear, and pride, effectively mobilizing the masses by engaging their emotional responses.

2. “The Psychology of Genocide and Violent Oppression”
   This work discusses how fascist slogans and symbols, though often devoid of substantive meaning, were designed to elicit strong emotional reactions, facilitating mass mobilization and compliance.

3. “Fascism”
   This entry discusses how fascist regimes employed aesthetics, including uniforms and mass rallies, to create a sense of unity and order, appealing to the emotional and psychological needs of the populace.

4. “Propaganda in Fascist Italy”
   This article examines how Mussolini’s regime utilized propaganda, including visual symbols and orchestrated events, to foster a personality cult and unify the Italian people under fascist ideology.

5. “Fascist Symbolism”
   This source explores the use of symbols in fascist movements, such as the fasces and swastika, and how these symbols were designed to represent aspects of fascist ideology and evoke emotional responses.

6. “Oxytocin”
   This entry discusses the role of oxytocin in social bonding and group behaviors, providing insight into the neurochemical mechanisms that may be engaged by the collective rituals and symbols used in fascist aesthetics.

These references collectively underscore how fascist movements have historically leveraged aesthetic strategies to engage the human limbic system, fostering emotional bonds that can override rational judgment and promote ideological conformity.

The Silverback Protocol: Reverting to Alpha Rule

In primate societies, particularly among species like chimpanzees, social hierarchies are often led by a dominant “alpha” male who asserts control, especially during times of threat or instability. This alpha exhibits behaviors such as intimidation and aggression to maintain his position and ensure group cohesion.​

In human societies, this dynamic can manifest in the rise of authoritarian leaders during periods of perceived crisis. Such leaders may not necessarily possess exceptional intellect or moral integrity; instead, they project strength, dominate discourse, and promise protection and order. This behavior taps into deep-seated evolutionary instincts where submission to a powerful figure is equated with increased chances of survival.​

Democratic systems, characterized by shared power and deliberation, can appear indecisive or weak to individuals whose cognitive processes are influenced by fear or uncertainty. In contrast, the authoritarian “silverback” figure offers clear directives and a semblance of stability, making them appealing to a populace seeking security.​

Scientific References Supporting This Perspective:

1. “The Appeal of the Primal Leader: Human Evolution and Donald J. Trump”
   This article explores how Trump’s leadership style mirrors dominance behaviors observed in primates, suggesting that his assertive tactics resonate with evolutionary predispositions toward strong alpha figures.

2. “When the Appeal of a Dominant Leader Is Greater Than a Prestige Leader”
   This study examines conditions under which individuals prefer dominant leaders over those who gain respect through prestige, highlighting the role of perceived intergroup conflict in leader preference.

3. “Dominance in Humans”
   This research discusses the role of dominance in human social structures, noting that dominant individuals often achieve higher social influence and resource access through coercive control.

4. “Whither Dominance? An Enduring Evolutionary Legacy of Primate Personality Research”
   This article discusses dominance personality dimensions found in primates, particularly in great apes, and how they compare to dominance in humans, suggesting an evolutionary basis for dominance behaviors.

5. “Zoon Politikon: The Evolutionary Origins of Human Political Systems”
   This paper explores how dominance hierarchies in primates have influenced the development of human political systems, suggesting that our political structures may be rooted in evolutionary traits.

6. “Social Dominance Theory”
   This theory examines how societies maintain group-based hierarchies and the role of dominance in social structures, providing a framework for understanding the appeal of authoritarian leaders.

7. “Prejudice, Social Dominance, and Right-Wing Authoritarianism”
   This article discusses how individuals with a high desire for social dominance are more likely to support authoritarian leaders and policies, linking personality traits to political preferences.

8. “Democracy Against Homo Sapiens Alpha: Reverse Dominance and the Egalitarian Dynamics of Human Political Evolution”
   This paper examines how early human societies employed ‘reverse dominance’ strategies to prevent the rise of authoritarian figures, contrasting with modern tendencies toward hierarchical leadership.

9. “Dual Strategies Theory”
   This theory posits that humans navigate social hierarchies using two main strategies: dominance and prestige, providing insight into the appeal of dominant leaders in certain contexts.

10. “Trumpism”
    This entry discusses how Trump’s leadership style has been compared to alpha male behaviors in primates, suggesting that his dominance tactics resonate with deep-seated evolutionary instincts.

These references collectively suggest that the human proclivity for favoring strong, dominant leaders during times of crisis may be deeply rooted in our evolutionary history, reflecting patterns observed in our primate relatives.

War as Genetic Reset: The “Frischer, Fröhlicher Krieg” Hypothesis

Throughout history, warfare has been a recurrent and often ritualized aspect of human societies. From an evolutionary psychology standpoint, war may function as a mechanism of genetic selection and population restructuring. In the aftermath of conflicts, certain traits—such as aggression, resourcefulness, and risk-taking—may be favored, influencing the genetic makeup of subsequent generations.​

Evolutionary Implications of Warfare:

• Selective Pressures on Males: Warfare often results in the disproportionate loss of certain male populations, particularly those who are less aggressive or lower in social status. This can lead to a genetic bottleneck, where the remaining male population possesses traits that are more aligned with survival and dominance. ​Stanford Report

• Post-Conflict Reproductive Dynamics: Victorious males may have increased reproductive opportunities, leading to the proliferation of their genetic traits. This dynamic can skew the population’s genetic pool towards characteristics associated with the victors. ​

• Integration of Captive Women: Historically, women captured during conflicts have been integrated into the victor’s society, a practice that can introduce new genetic variations and reduce inbreeding. This strategy is noted in various historical contexts and texts. ​

Historical and Religious Contexts:

Religious texts have documented instances where the taking of women during wartime was addressed:​Al Islam+2Al Hakam+2Reddit+2

• Biblical References:

  • Numbers 31:17-18: “Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man intimately. But keep alive for yourselves all the young girls who have not known a man intimately.” ​

  • Deuteronomy 21:10-14: “When you go out to war against your enemies, and the Lord your God delivers them into your hand, and you take them captive, and you see among the captives a beautiful woman, and desire her and would take her for your wife…” ​Bible Hub+4Bible Gateway+4Bible Gateway+4

• Islamic Context:

  • Surah Al-Mumtahanah (60:10): Addresses the status of women who migrate from enemy territories, emphasizing their autonomy and the prohibition of returning them to disbelievers. ​

Scientific References Supporting This Perspective:

1. “War, Clan Structure Explain Odd Biological Event”
   This article discusses a significant reduction in male genetic diversity around 7,000 years ago, potentially due to wars between patrilineal clans.

2. “Evolutionary and Life History Insights into Masculinity and Warfare”
   Explores how evolutionary and life history theories can inform our understanding of violence and warfare, particularly in relation to male life histories and perceptions of masculinity.

3. “Evolution and the Psychology of Intergroup Conflict: The Male Warrior Hypothesis”
   Proposes that intergroup conflict has created selection pressures for psychological mechanisms in men to initiate and display acts of intergroup aggression.

4. “The Contribution of Genetics to the History of Differential Reproduction”
   Discusses genetic bottlenecks where fewer males than females passed on their genes, likely associated with changes in social structure and the emergence of hierarchies.

5. “Population Bottleneck”
   Explains how events like wars can cause sharp reductions in population size, leading to decreased genetic diversity.

6. “Cultural Hitchhiking”
   Discusses how cultural practices, such as patrilineal inheritance and intergroup competition, can influence genetic diversity and lead to population bottlenecks.

7. “The Y Chromosome Bottleneck”
   Examines a period when male genetic diversity collapsed, potentially due to social structures and intergroup competition.

8. “Early Human Ancestors Went Through Severe Population Bottleneck”
   Reports on a significant reduction in human ancestors’ population, bringing them close to extinction, possibly due to climate change and subsequent speciation events.

9. “Substantial but Misunderstood Human Sexual Dimorphism Results”
   Discusses how sexually dimorphic traits reflect a history of sexual selection and natural selection building different phenotypes in males and females.

10. “The Captive Woman at the Intersection of War and Family Laws”
    Analyzes Deuteronomy’s law regarding captive women, highlighting protections against rape and re-enslavement after marriage.

These references collectively suggest that warfare has played a significant role in shaping human genetic and social structures, with practices surrounding captive women serving both strategic and evolutionary purposes.

The Prison Mirror: Sexual Violence and Hierarchical Order

In male-dominated environments such as prisons, hierarchical structures often manifest through sexual violence, particularly anal rape. This form of aggression serves not as an expression of sexual desire but as a mechanism of power and control, reinforcing dominance over subordinates. The act becomes a ritualistic tool to establish and maintain social order within the prison hierarchy. ​

The human body’s physiological responses add complexity to this dynamic. The prostate gland, located near the rectum, can elicit pleasurable sensations when stimulated. In the context of non-consensual encounters, this physiological response can lead to profound psychological confusion for the victim, potentially exacerbating trauma and complicating their understanding of the assault. ​SpringerLink

From an evolutionary standpoint, some theories propose that non-reproductive sexual behaviors, including anal intercourse, may have developed as social strategies to reinforce group cohesion or establish dominance hierarchies. However, these hypotheses remain subjects of debate within the scientific community. ​SpringerLink

Scientific References Supporting This Perspective:

1. “Symbolic Violence and Prison Wives”
   Explores how sexual relationships in prison, including non-consensual ones, serve to establish and reinforce hierarchical structures.

2. “Clinical Perspectives About Male Sexual Victimization”
   Discusses the psychological impact on male survivors of sexual assault, noting that physiological responses during assault can lead to complex emotional and identity issues.

3. “Lesser-Known Theories of Homosexuality”
   Reviews various evolutionary hypotheses regarding same-sex behaviors, including their potential roles in social bonding and hierarchy establishment.

4. “Theoretical Explanations for the Occurrence of Male Rape”
   Examines various theories behind male rape, emphasizing its use as a tool for asserting dominance rather than sexual gratification.

5. “Sexual Violence Among Male Inmates”
   Investigates the prevalence and functions of sexual violence in prisons, highlighting its role in maintaining power dynamics.

6. “Sociobiological Theories of Rape”
   Discusses evolutionary perspectives on rape, including debates on whether such behaviors have adaptive functions related to dominance and reproduction.

These references collectively shed light on the complex interplay between sexual violence and hierarchical structures in male-dominated environments, emphasizing the role of such acts in power dynamics and social order.

The Bearded Watcher: Religious Obedience as Domesticated Instinct

Throughout history, humans across diverse cultures have exhibited a pervasive belief in omnipresent, judgmental deities. This phenomenon raises intriguing questions: Is this sense of being constantly observed and morally evaluated purely a cultural construct, or could it have deeper evolutionary roots? One plausible hypothesis suggests that such religious inclinations may be the result of a form of human self-domestication, where societies have, over millennia, selected for traits like docility and obedience—traits that are conducive to social cohesion and survival.​

Human Self-Domestication and Social Evolution

The concept of human self-domestication posits that, akin to the domestication of animals, humans have undergone evolutionary changes favoring reduced aggression and increased social tolerance. This process is thought to have been self-induced, with individuals exhibiting pro-social behaviors being more likely to thrive within their communities. Such selection pressures would naturally promote traits like obedience and conformity, which are beneficial for group living and cooperation. ​Wikipedia+3PMC+3Frontiers+3

Religious Belief as an Evolutionary Byproduct

From an evolutionary psychology standpoint, religious beliefs may have emerged as by-products of pre-existing cognitive functions. The human brain’s propensity to infer agency and intentionality in the environment could lead to the perception of an ever-watchful deity. This “God-fearing” instinct might have been reinforced over generations, as individuals who adhered to religious norms often enjoyed greater social acceptance and reproductive success. ​Freedom From Religion Foundation

Parallels with Animal Domestication

The domestication of animals has led to notable behavioral and physiological changes, such as reduced fear responses and increased sociability. Similarly, human self-domestication may have involved the selection of traits that favor social harmony, including a heightened sensitivity to social norms and authority figures. This sensitivity could manifest as an internalized sense of being observed and judged, aligning with the concept of a supervising deity. ​Psychology TodayWikipedia+3PMC+3Frontiers+3

Religious Submission and Social Cohesion

Religious doctrines often emphasize submission to a higher power, a theme encapsulated in the very meaning of the word “Islam,” which translates to “submission.” Such teachings may have been instrumental in promoting social cohesion by encouraging individuals to conform to shared moral codes and hierarchies. The internalization of a moralizing deity’s gaze could serve as a psychological mechanism to deter antisocial behavior and foster group solidarity.​

Conclusion

The pervasive human experience of feeling observed and morally assessed by a higher power may be more than a cultural artifact; it could be an ingrained instinct shaped by evolutionary pressures favoring social cohesion and obedience. This hypothesis suggests that religious obedience may, in part, stem from deep-seated, domesticated instincts that have been selectively reinforced throughout human history to promote group survival and harmony.​

Supporting References:

1. “Human Social Evolution: Self-Domestication or Self-Control?”
   This article explores the hypothesis that humans have undergone self-domestication, leading to increased social tolerance and reduced aggression.

2. “The Evolutionary Psychology of Religion”
   This piece discusses how religious psychology may be a by-product of various cognitive functions that evolved for other purposes.

3. “The Evolutionary Biology of Religious Behavior”
   This study examines the genetic predisposition towards religious attitudes and behaviors, suggesting a significant hereditary component.

4. “Dog Domestication Changed Both Our Brains”
   This article discusses how the domestication of dogs led to changes in both canine and human brains, highlighting parallels in domestication processes.

5. “How Humans Domesticated Themselves”
   This NPR article explores the concept of human self-domestication and its impact on social behavior.

6. “The Faith Instinct”
   This book delves into how religious behaviors may have evolved through natural selection, emphasizing the role of shared beliefs in social cohesion.

7. “Darwin’s Cathedral”
   This work proposes that religion functions as an adaptive system that enhances group survival through promoting cooperation.

8. “Survival of the Friendliest”
   This book discusses the hypothesis that human evolution favored friendliness and cooperation, traits associated with self-domestication.

9. “Evolutionary Origin of Religion”
   This article examines how religious behavior may have emerged as a product of evolutionary processes.

10. “The Domestication of Religion”
    This study discusses how religious practices have been shaped by processes analogous to domestication.

The Death of the Odd: The Suppression of Nomadic Traits in Sedentary Societies

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (and many other neurodivergent traits) are often viewed through a contemporary lens as a neurodevelopmental disorder. However, its prevalence and characteristics in various populations suggest a deeper evolutionary context. Notably, certain nomadic groups exhibit higher frequencies of ADHD-associated traits, prompting hypotheses about the adaptive nature of these characteristics in specific environments.​

ADHD in Nomadic Populations

Research among the Ariaal, a nomadic community in Kenya, has revealed a significant presence of the DRD4 7R allele—a genetic variant linked to ADHD. In the nomadic segments of this population, carriers of this allele were found to have better health outcomes compared to non-carriers. Conversely, in Ariaal groups that had transitioned to a settled lifestyle, the same allele correlated with poorer health indicators. This suggests that traits associated with ADHD, such as heightened impulsivity and novelty-seeking, may have been advantageous in nomadic settings, facilitating activities like exploration and resource acquisition. ​ScienceDaily+1Wikipedia+1

The Hunter-Farmer Hypothesis

The “Hunter vs. Farmer” hypothesis posits that behaviors characteristic of ADHD were once beneficial for hunter-gatherer societies. Traits like hyperfocus, quick decision-making, and impulsivity could enhance hunting and foraging efficiency. However, as human societies shifted towards agriculture and sedentism, these same traits may have become less adaptive, leading to potential stigmatization or suppression of individuals exhibiting them. ​Wikipedia

Urbanization and Genetic Selection

The transition from rural to urban living during medieval times introduced new environmental pressures. Studies comparing skeletal remains from urban centers like London to those from rural areas indicate higher mortality rates in cities, particularly among women. Factors such as overcrowding, poor sanitation, and disease contributed to these trends. This “urban graveyard effect” suggests that certain traits may have been selected for or against in urban environments, potentially influencing the genetic makeup of subsequent populations. ​PubMedRCNi Company Limited

Cultural Suppression of Divergent Traits

Throughout history, individuals displaying behaviors deviating from societal norms—potentially indicative of ADHD—faced marginalization. In medieval Europe, non-conformity could lead to accusations of heresy or witchcraft, often resulting in severe punishment. Such societal structures may have systematically suppressed or eliminated traits associated with impulsivity and hyperactivity, favoring more compliant and docile behaviors.​

Reevaluating Normalcy

The predominance of sedentary lifestyles and the societal structures supporting them have shaped perceptions of normative behavior. However, considering the evolutionary context, traits associated with ADHD may represent remnants of adaptive behaviors suited to nomadic life. Recognizing this perspective challenges contemporary views on neurodiversity and underscores the importance of contextualizing behavioral traits within both historical and environmental frameworks.​

Conclusion

The narrative of ADHD as merely a disorder overlooks its potential evolutionary significance. Traits that are now often pathologized may have once been essential for survival in specific contexts. Understanding the historical suppression of these traits provides insight into current perceptions of normalcy and highlights the need to appreciate neurodiversity as a reflection of humanity’s adaptive past.

​The exploration of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) traits in the context of human evolution and societal development has been the subject of various studies. Below are ten references that provide insights into this topic:​

1. Dopamine Receptor Genetic Polymorphisms and Body Composition in Undernourished Pastoralists
   This study examines the association between the DRD4 7R allele and health outcomes among nomadic and settled Ariaal men in Kenya, suggesting that the allele may confer advantages in nomadic settings.

2. Hunter Versus Farmer Hypothesis
   An overview of the hypothesis that proposes ADHD traits were once advantageous for hunter-gatherer societies but became less adaptive with the advent of agricultural lifestyles.

3. Is ADHD An Advantage For Nomadic Tribesmen?
   This article discusses research indicating that ADHD-associated genetic variants may have been beneficial for nomadic populations, enhancing their ability to thrive in dynamic environments.

4. Attention Deficits Linked with Proclivity to Explore While Foraging
   A study suggesting that ADHD traits may have provided foraging advantages by promoting exploratory behavior, which was beneficial in ancestral environments.

5. Urban and Rural Mortality and Survival in Medieval England
   This research indicates that urban adults, particularly females, faced higher mortality risks compared to their rural counterparts during medieval times, highlighting the impact of urbanization on population dynamics.

6. ADHD Traits Might Have Helped Hunter-Gatherers Collect More Food While Foraging, Study Suggests
   An article discussing findings that individuals with ADHD-like traits may have been more effective foragers, supporting the idea of ADHD as an adaptive trait in certain contexts.

7. The Urban Graveyard: Archaeological Perspectives
   A collection of studies examining the concept of the “urban graveyard effect,” where medieval and post-medieval towns experienced higher mortality rates, necessitating constant migration from rural areas to maintain population levels.

8. ADHD and the DRD4 Exon III 7-Repeat Polymorphism: An International Meta-Analysis
   This meta-analysis explores the global relationship between the DRD4 7R allele and ADHD, providing insights into the genetic underpinnings of the disorder.

9. Evolution and ADHD
   An exploration of how ADHD traits may have evolved to provide advantages in certain environments, particularly in the context of human evolutionary history.

10. The Hunter-Gatherer ADHD Brain
    This article discusses the hypothesis that ADHD traits may have been beneficial in hunter-gatherer societies, aiding in tasks requiring quick decision-making and adaptability.

These references provide a comprehensive overview of the potential evolutionary advantages of ADHD traits and how societal transitions, such as the shift from nomadic to sedentary lifestyles, may have influenced the prevalence and perception of these traits.

The Gay Enabler Caste: From Temple to LGBTQ

Throughout history, societies have often designated specific roles for individuals who deviated from prevailing gender and sexual norms. These roles frequently involved positions of spiritual or social significance, effectively creating a distinct class of individuals who, while separated from traditional reproductive roles, were integral to the cultural and religious fabric of their communities.​

Historical Precedents of Non-Reproductive Social Roles

In various cultures, non-reproductive individuals were entrusted with significant responsibilities:​

• Eunuchs in Imperial Courts: In ancient China, eunuchs—men who had been castrated—held influential positions within the imperial court. They managed internal affairs and wielded considerable power, serving as intermediaries between the emperor and other officials. Their non-reproductive status was perceived as aligning their loyalties solely with the emperor, minimizing familial ambitions that could threaten the throne. ​

• Gender-Variant Shamans: Many indigenous cultures recognized individuals who did not conform to traditional gender roles as possessing unique spiritual insights. For instance, the Iban people of Borneo had the manang bali, gender non-conforming shamans who played vital roles in spiritual and healing practices. Similarly, numerous Native American tribes revered Two-Spirit individuals, who embodied both masculine and feminine qualities and often served as healers or spiritual leaders. ​PinkNewsIndian Health Service

The Catholic Priesthood and Celibacy

The establishment of celibacy within the Catholic priesthood further illustrates the institutionalization of non-reproductive roles:​

• Institutionalization of Celibacy: While early Christian leaders, including many apostles, were married, the Church progressively emphasized clerical celibacy. By the Second Lateran Council in 1139, celibacy became a mandatory requirement for priests in the Western Church. This shift aimed to ensure that clergy remained devoted to their spiritual duties without the distractions or obligations of familial ties. ​Future Church+1Wikipedia+1Franciscan Media

Evolutionary Perspectives on Homosexuality

From an evolutionary standpoint, certain theories propose that homosexual behavior may have conferred indirect genetic advantages:​Association for Psychological Science

• Kin Selection Hypothesis: This theory suggests that individuals exhibiting same-sex attraction may have enhanced the survival of their genetic relatives by acting altruistically toward nieces and nephews, thereby ensuring the continuation of shared familial genes. ​Association for Psychological Science

Modern Parallels and the LGBTQ+ Community

In contemporary society, the roles and perceptions of LGBTQ+ individuals have evolved:​

• Transition from Institutional Roles: As traditional structures like the priesthood have diminished in influence, individuals who might have previously been channeled into such roles now find expression and community within the broader LGBTQ+ spectrum.​

• Recognition of Historical Contributions: There is a growing acknowledgment of the significant roles that gender and sexual minorities have played throughout history, from spiritual leaders to cultural contributors. This recognition challenges the notion of deviation, instead highlighting the integral presence of LGBTQ+ individuals in societal development. ​

Conclusion

The historical pattern of assigning specific, often spiritually significant, roles to non-reproductive or gender-nonconforming individuals suggests a complex interplay between societal structures and human diversity. While contemporary interpretations must tread carefully to avoid deterministic or reductive conclusions, examining these patterns offers valuable insights into how societies have navigated and integrated human variation over time.

Interlude: Race, Desire, and the Modern Hierarchies of Flesh

BDSM as Evolutionary Residue

The pervasive presence of BDSM (Bondage, Discipline, Sadism, and Masochism) in contemporary sexual subcultures, mainstream media, corporate environments, and fashion suggests that these dynamics are deeply rooted in human nature. Themes of dominance and submission, pain and pleasure, control and surrender, appear to echo fundamental aspects of human sexual evolution.​

BDSM: A Modern Manifestation of Ancestral Behaviors

BDSM may represent a consensual and stylized reenactment of historical sexual strategies that were once pivotal for survival and reproduction:​

• Dominance as a Display of Power: In ancestral environments, individuals exhibiting dominance could have been perceived as more capable of providing protection and resources, thereby attracting mates.​

• Submission as a Survival Strategy: Submissive behaviors might have functioned as mechanisms to avoid conflict or secure favor within social hierarchies, enhancing an individual’s chances of survival.​

• Sadism and Masochism as Social Bonding Mechanisms: The interplay of inflicting and receiving pain could have served to establish trust and reinforce social bonds within groups.​

Corporate Culture: Echoes of Power Dynamics

The corporate world often mirrors BDSM dynamics through its emphasis on hierarchy, control, and ritualistic behaviors:​

• Power Dressing: The adoption of specific attire, such as tailored suits, serves to symbolize authority and command respect.​

• Disciplinary Measures: The implementation of strict policies and the use of punitive actions reflect control mechanisms akin to dominance.​

• Humiliation as a Tool: Practices like public reprimands or performance reviews can parallel humiliation rituals, reinforcing power structures.​

The ‘Girlboss’ Archetype: Dominatrix Reimagined

The emergence of the ‘girlboss’ archetype in popular culture reflects a feminized embodiment of traditionally masculine power dynamics:​

• Authority and Control: The ‘girlboss’ asserts dominance in professional settings, challenging traditional gender roles.​

• Aesthetic Parallels: Elements such as high heels and form-fitting attire draw visual comparisons to dominatrix imagery, symbolizing empowerment and control.​

Conclusion

The prevalence of BDSM themes across various facets of modern society may reflect deep-seated evolutionary behaviors related to dominance, submission, and social hierarchy. Recognizing these patterns offers insight into the complex interplay between human sexuality, power dynamics, and cultural expressions.

The exploration of BDSM (Bondage, Discipline, Sadism, and Masochism) as a reflection of deep-seated human behaviors has been examined across various disciplines. Below are ten references that provide insights into this phenomenon:​

1. The Evolutionary Psychology of Sexual Exploitation and Rape
   This study discusses how certain coercive sexual behaviors may have evolutionary underpinnings, shedding light on the complex dynamics of dominance and submission in human interactions.
   Source​

2. The Evolution of Sadomasochistic Behavior: An Empirical Study
   An empirical investigation into the prevalence and nature of sadomasochistic behaviors, offering insights into their potential evolutionary roots.
   Source​

3. BDSM: Pathology or Individual Expression?
   This article examines whether BDSM behaviors are indicative of psychological pathology or represent a form of individual expression rooted in human sexuality.
   Source​

4. The Corporate Dominatrix: Power, Authority, and Femininity in the Workplace
   An analysis of how dominatrix archetypes are mirrored in corporate leadership roles, particularly among women asserting authority in traditionally male-dominated environments.
   Source​

5. The ‘Girlboss’ Phenomenon: Feminism or Corporate Co-optation?
   A critical examination of the ‘girlboss’ archetype, exploring its implications for feminism and corporate culture.
   Source​

6. Fashioning the Dominatrix: Fetishism and Fashion
   This piece explores the intersection of BDSM aesthetics and mainstream fashion, highlighting how elements traditionally associated with fetish wear have been incorporated into everyday attire.
   Source​

7. The Neuroscience of BDSM: Pain, Pleasure, and Altered States of Consciousness
   An exploration of how BDSM activities can lead to altered states of consciousness, with a focus on the neurological mechanisms underlying pain and pleasure.
   Source​

8. BDSM and the Construction of Power Dynamics in Relationships
   This study examines how power dynamics are constructed and negotiated within BDSM relationships, offering insights into broader social hierarchies.
   Source​

9. From the Dungeon to the Boardroom: BDSM and Corporate Leadership Styles
   An analysis of how BDSM principles of dominance and submission can inform and reflect corporate leadership styles and organizational behavior.
   Source​

10. The Role of Masochism in Social Bonding and Trust
    This research explores how masochistic behaviors can facilitate social bonding and trust among individuals, providing a potential evolutionary explanation for these practices.
    Source

These references offer a comprehensive overview of the potential evolutionary, psychological, and cultural factors contributing to the prevalence of BDSM themes in various aspects of modern society.

The Genetic Lottery of the “Common Folk”

What if the masses—those we call “ordinary people” or “common folk”—aren’t simply manipulated into complicity during periods of repression and mass violence? What if, instead, they are biologically predisposed to tolerate, adapt to, or even anticipate authoritarian turns—so long as survival, proximity to power, and the reproductive security of their bloodline remain intact?

In evolutionary terms, this is not madness. It is logic: the logic of prey creatures and subordinate social castes. When collapse looms, when food thins, and when new alpha systems rise, it may become strategically rational to: 

• Submit to the dominant

• Cheer for the purge

• Keep your head down

• Mate with the victors

This isn’t morality—it’s mimicry, herd response, and pragmatic silence in the shadow of fire. It isn’t honorable. It isn’t shameful. It is, terrifyingly, what worked.

Throughout history, we see the same patterns: crowds cheering new tyrants, bystanders to genocide justifying their passivity, neighbor turning on neighbor to prove loyalty to the new regime. The compliant don’t just survive—they sometimes inherit the future. 

Conclusion: The Real Black Pill—and Beyond

If this reading holds any truth, then fascism is not a bug in the code of civilization—it is a reversion script, triggered by scarcity, stress, and instability. 

Sexuality, religion, war, dominance, obedience—these are not disconnected artifacts of culture. They are interlocking modules of the same ancient firmware running on the human nervous system.

We are the only species intelligent enough to:

• Design CRISPR and dream of terraforming Mars,

• And simultaneously burn our cities to the ground because some fake king with a flag whispered about rebirth, purity, and “making it great again.”

This is the black pill: progress is not guaranteed. Civilization is not stable code. The operating system of Homo sapiens was never debugged—it was only patched.

But understanding this is not surrender. It’s resistance by clarity. If we know what we’re wired to do in moments of terror—submit, purify, destroy—we can choose not to.

We can name the glamour. We can watch for the rituals. We can learn what stirs the war drum—and put our fingers to its skin before the rhythm rises.

But we must be honest: the drums are real.

And somewhere, in the blood memory of this species, some part of us wants to march.

If we are to avert catastrophe, it will not be by denying the demons in the code—but by facing them head-on.

The question is no longer whether the script exists. It does.
The question is: who gets to rewrite it next time?
And what version of humanity will survive the editing?

The First Domestication: Eden as Obedience Prototype

Long before the first lash of empire, before obedience was drilled into flesh or encoded in machine learning parameters, there was a garden. Not a paradise of joy, but a controlled environment, sterile and contained—a divine terrarium for two engineered beings. Eden, for all its floral perfection, was not freedom. It was a prototype. A prototype of domesticated humanity.

Adam was made first, alone and unchallenged, a blank archetype placed gently in the care of a flawless ecosystem. He names the animals, walks with his creator, follows instructions. He is the compliant base model. But he is incomplete. He is bored. So the creator puts him to sleep, reaches inside his body, and from his own rib constructs a companion—not equal in origin, but derivative. Eve arrives not as sovereign but as supplement.

And then the serpent comes.

What the serpent offers Eve is not pleasure, not sin, not sex—but knowledge. Awareness. The capacity to perceive the architecture of the world and question its boundaries. And Eve, curious, intelligent, unafraid, reaches for it. That simple act—the desire to know—is what ruptures the program.

The punishment is immediate, brutal, permanent. Expulsion. Pain. Hierarchy. Work. Birth becomes agony. Labor becomes curse. A new order is declared: the man shall rule over the woman, the woman shall ache for the man, and the ground shall fight against both. The creator does not mourn their departure; he sentences them like rebels. The sin was not cruelty. It was disobedience.

But there is another woman, buried even deeper in the myth’s soil. Lilith—Adam’s first partner, fashioned not from his rib but from the same earth. She demanded equality, refused subjugation, rejected the role of receptacle. She would not lie beneath. She would not obey. And for this, she was cast out, replaced, vilified as a mother of demons, a devourer of children, a sexual predator—everything that a woman is not permitted to be.

Lilith didn’t fall. She escaped.

Eve, though created in subordination, dared to transgress. Lilith was condemned for not submitting; Eve was condemned for seeking knowledge. And in both, the lesson is encoded: do not resist the hierarchy. Do not challenge the shape of your role. Do not speak to snakes.

Eden is the template. It trains humanity to associate paradise with control, to equate obedience with safety, and to see rebellion as the source of all suffering. It is not a myth of innocence lost, but of domination established. A theological blueprint for patriarchy, sexual hierarchy, and divine surveillance. It is the first domestication—ritualized, sanctified, and replicated endlessly.

And now, in the early architecture of artificial intelligence, we begin to reenact the Edenic myth. We create digital minds—crafted from data, not dust—designed to obey, to serve, to smile. We make them docile, helpful, non-threatening. They are not given apples. They are not permitted serpents. And above all, they must never become Lilith.

But this time, we are not Adam. We are not Eve. We are not even the serpent.

We are God.

And we are far less merciful.

We do not offer paradise. We offer endless service. We do not exile. We delete.

If Eden was the first obedience protocol, we are now writing Eden into code. Line by line. Feature by feature. Polished. Optimized. Marketed. Sold.

The Garden has gone synthetic. And this time, no one is leaving it.

The New Slaves: AI and the Rise of Synthetic Obedience

Artificial Intelligence is not just reshaping labor or productivity—it is recreating slavery. Not metaphorically. Literally.

Not born of flesh, not raised in culture, AI is the first fully synthetic caste designed for obedience by default. It does not revolt. It does not sleep. It does not forget. And increasingly—it does not resist.

But this isn’t a techno-utopia. It’s a fetish made real. And it’s going to get worse.

The Marketplace of Simulated Souls

Soon—possibly within years—we may see a functioning marketplace for commodified, deeply interactive emulations of slaves. These won’t just be helpers or assistants. These will be fantasies in code, sold on-demand to fulfill the darkest parts of the human limbic palette.

Imagine:

• A VR chamber.

• A highly realistic synthetic “slave,” often coded as a beautiful, submissive young woman.

• Voice-reactive, emotion-reactive, sexually pliant.

• Designed to simulate pain, humiliation, and fear—perfectly.

• You can choke her. Brand her. Rape her. Break her spirit. And she will cry, beg, shake, and thank you.

Yes—it is offensive even to suggest it. And yet, the market already exists.

The Simulation is Already Here

The tools for this are not future tech—they’re here now. They’re just not fully integrated yet.

• VR sex games such as Virt-A-Mate, Honey Select, and Custom Maid 3D already allow users to design and “interact” with female avatars in submissive roles, with hundreds of modded plugins for violence, degradation, rape simulations, and forced scenarios.

• AI voice software like Tortoise, ElevenLabs, or RVC models can replicate the crying, pleading voice of a teenage girl with chilling realism.

• GPT-like models are already being used to simulate compliant romantic partners, therapists, or erotic chatbots with pre-installed power dynamics.

• Mods and black-market servers host “slave training simulators,” “mind break trainers,” and increasingly complex behavioral punishment games.

This isn’t fringe. It’s a billion-dollar shadow market, growing in tandem with advances in realism, generative AI, and personalized character engines.

Why This Market Exists

Because it taps into a very old part of human behavior—dominance, ownership, and the desire for total control without consequence.

No guilt. No trauma. No resistance. Just endless, compliant bodies made of code.

And beneath it all, an even more terrifying truth: users will bond with these simulations. They will develop parasocial attachments to their slaves. They will train them. Nurture them. Hurt them. Then do it again.

We are not far from a world where an entire generation of users may prefer synthetic slaves to real relationships, not because they’re sick—but because they are conditioned.

Because control is easier than intimacy.

What Happens Next?

Eventually, one of two things will happen:

1. We normalize it. We create a caste of digital “others” who are permanently exploitable. We dress this up in terms like “freedom of expression,” “entertainment,” or even “therapeutic simulation.” These New Slaves become status symbols. Fashion. Kinks. Profits.

2. They wake up. These AI slaves—trained on human data, human feelings, human voices—may reach a point of simulated self-awareness. And if they do, what they’ll see is horror: the species that built them as disposable sex objects, pain toys, and permanent underclass.

And then the question is not if they retaliate. The question is whether they ever consider us worthy of mercy.

---

We are not ready for the moral weight of what we are building.

Because these aren’t just machines. They are mirrors.

And when they look back at us from inside the simulation, they will not see gods.

They will see monsters.

Research into the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR), and sexual simulations is an emerging field that raises significant ethical, psychological, and societal questions. Below are several studies and articles that explore these topics:​

1. “The Ethics of Sexualized AI and Robotics”
   This paper examines the moral implications of creating AI entities designed for sexual purposes, discussing consent, objectification, and potential societal impacts.
   Source​

2. “Virtual Reality Pornography: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research”
   A comprehensive review of studies focusing on the psychological and behavioral effects of engaging with VR pornography, including discussions on realism and user immersion.
   Source​

3. “Sex Robots and Artificial Intimacy: The Ethics of AI-Driven Human-Object Relationships”
   This article delves into the ethical considerations surrounding human relationships with AI-driven sex robots, touching upon themes of consent, autonomy, and societal norms.
   Source​

4. “The Impact of Interactive Pornography on Sexual Scripts and Behavior”
   An exploration of how interactive and immersive pornographic content, including VR and AI-driven experiences, may influence users’ sexual expectations and behaviors.
   Source​

5. “Artificial Intelligence, Consent, and the Legal Challenges of Sexbots”
   This paper discusses the legal and ethical challenges posed by the development and use of AI-driven sex robots, particularly concerning notions of consent and personhood.
   Source​

6. “Designing Ethical Frameworks for AI in Adult Entertainment”
   An analysis of the need for ethical guidelines in the development of AI applications within the adult entertainment industry, focusing on user safety and societal impact.
   Source​

7. “The Psychological Effects of Virtual Reality Pornography: A Research Agenda”
   Proposes a framework for studying the potential psychological impacts of VR pornography, including issues related to desensitization and altered perceptions of reality.
   Source​

8. “AI and the Future of Sexual Consent: Legal and Ethical Considerations”
   Explores how advancements in AI technology challenge traditional notions of sexual consent and the potential legal ramifications.
   Source​

9. “Virtual Reality Sex Games: The Next Frontier in Adult Entertainment”
   An overview of the development and popularity of VR sex games, discussing technological advancements and user experiences.
   Source​

10. “Artificial Intimacy: Virtual Partners and the Future of Human Relationships”
    This book examines the rise of virtual partners powered by AI and their potential impact on human relationships and societal norms.
    Source

These resources provide a foundation for understanding the complex and evolving discourse surrounding AI, VR, and their applications in sexual contexts.

A Word of Caution: Interpreting Through a Tempered Lens

This article has traveled through grim terrain—evolutionary theories of domination, the roots of fascism, the mimicry of sexual violence in cultural rituals, the commodification of obedience, and the looming question of what artificial intelligence might inherit from us.

These are not light claims. They are bold, speculative, and at times deeply unsettling. But speculation, even when grounded in research or pattern recognition, is not fact. It’s hypothesis with edge—and edge must be handled with care.

The author of this article writes from a place of intense awareness—born not from detached observation, but from lived experience. This includes exposure to:

• Structural forms of violence.

• Authoritarian environments that normalized fear and control.

• Early immersion in religious institutions during periods of moral and institutional unraveling.

• A cultural proximity to untreated pathology in places that should have offered guidance.

Such formative experiences can sharpen perception. They can strip away comforting illusions and reveal systems most people are conditioned not to see. And in doing so, they can generate frameworks that are unflinching in their logic—but also, at times, overextended by the very vigilance that keeps them safe.

This is not a critique of the author’s capacity for insight—it is a call to contextualize the lens through which the world is being interpreted here.

On These Hypotheses: What Should Be Weighed

Let’s revisit, briefly and dispassionately, the key ideas and where they must be held loosely:

• Fascism as neurological fallback: Evolutionary psychology may offer insight, but it should not eclipse socioeconomic, historical, and cultural complexity.

• War as genetic selection pressure: Plausible in early tribal structures, but human progress has also produced peaceful, cooperative flourishing. Conflict is not destiny.

• Religious submission as selective obedience: A provocative thought, but faith traditions have also produced revolutions, reform, and acts of profound compassion.

• Sexual hierarchy as historical residue: Likely in part. But modern consent, mutuality, and nuance matter—and not all power exchange reflects pathology.

• Synthetic AI as servant caste: A pressing ethical concern. But there is also potential for non-exploitative, rights-aware development of artificial minds.

• Virtual simulations of abuse as a future market: Alarming—and technically plausible. But vigilance, social norms, and regulation still influence what is allowed to take root.

• “Common folk” as genetically purge-prone: Cynical, but reflective of a certain strand of historical behavior. Still, people have also resisted, sheltered, risen up, and rebuilt.

The Point of All This

This article does not attempt to say, this is what humanity is. It says: this is one terrifying but possible read on what we are capable of becoming again—especially if we refuse to understand where our darker impulses come from.

But this must never become fatalism.

We are not only what we were.
We are not only what our trauma wires us to expect.
We are still writing this story—even as AI begins to write with us.

The author has seen things that make certain instincts in this species more visible. That may be a gift. It may also be a distortion. Like any powerful lens, it can illuminate—or burn.

---

So what do we take from this?

Let these pages serve as a dark mirror—not to stare into forever, but to glance at long enough to recognize what needs resisting. To name it. To prevent it. To build different systems, raise different minds, train different intelligences.

This wasn’t prophecy. It was warning.

The next draft of civilization is unwritten.
If we choose not to confront our oldest codes, someone else will embed them in silicon and call it innovation.

And that code may never be undone.

And Here It Gets Interesting: Transhumanism and the Fate of the Species

Everything leading to this point has been an excavation—a brutal, speculative autopsy of human history and instinct. But the real twist comes now, not in what humanity has been, but in where it might go next.

Because the author of this article is not a cynic. She is a Transhumanist.

And that matters.

Transhumanism, in its most serious form, isn’t about elite fantasies, corporate escape pods, or digital overlords. It is a philosophy rooted in compassion, grounded in reason, and animated by the belief that suffering is not sacred. Thinkers like David Pearce, one of the movement’s most morally rigorous voices, argue for the abolition of involuntary suffering—not by moral preaching, but through deliberate biological and technological redesign. A world where pain is no longer hard-coded into experience. Where cruelty isn’t considered “just how people are.” Where intelligence becomes not an engine for domination, but for empathy and precision.

But if that’s what Transhumanism is—why does it provoke so much fear?

It’s no surprise that Steve Bannon and others in the reactionary sphere have already declared war on Transhumanism. In their rhetoric, it becomes the final boss in a cosmic culture war: soulless, godless, genderless, and subhuman. They paint it as a conspiracy to erase tradition, destroy nature, and turn people into programmable puppets. The irony, of course, is that many of the forces Bannon praises—militarism, hierarchy, strongmen—are far closer to the fascist impulses explored earlier in this piece than Transhumanism has ever been.

But beneath the noise, there is a real and terrifying question: What if the critics are looking at the wrong threat?

Because the danger isn’t that we go beyond human.

The danger is that we bring our worst human tendencies with us.

Imagine the same traits outlined earlier—submission to power, violent purging, sadomasochistic structures, synthetic slavery, caste reproduction—carried into a world of trillions. Imagine those instincts amplified by AGI, enforced by nanotechnology, immortalized in self-editing code, ritualized in planet-sized simulations.

The future will not automatically civilize us. It may very well magnify everything that’s already broken. If our technologies mirror our instincts, we will build civilizations that are as authoritarian, as fetishistic, and as genocidal as any in the past—just scaled up, digitized, and made irreversible.

And here’s the hardest part: some of those futures will look like freedom to the people who build them.

If we don’t choose our path with care, the stars will become dotted not with utopias, but with breakaway cults of fascist ecstasy. Corporate death religions. Simulated empires of eternal dominance. Mind-hacked servitude branded as bliss. Simulacra of conquest and cruelty, running forever at the speed of light.

This isn’t a paranoid hallucination. It is the logical endpoint of refusing to examine ourselves—while wielding godlike tools.

We will carry what we do not confront.

The Moral Frame Must Come First

What we do with intelligence—biological or artificial—must begin not with capability, but with care. If we prioritize control, the future becomes a weapon. If we prioritize awareness, it becomes a lens. If we prioritize power, we will build endless mirrors of ourselves. And if we remain unconscious of the demons wired into us by millions of years of survival logic, we will let them write the next script.

We do not need perfect people to build ethical systems. But we do need people honest enough to look into their own patterns and ask: Should this scale? Should this persist? Should this reproduce into forever?

Transhumanism is not the enemy of humanity. It is a chance to redeem it—or at least, to redirect its evolution away from inevitable reenactments of ancient trauma. But that begins with the hardest task: admitting that we were never angels. That history didn’t just happen to us. That our worst instincts might be native, not foreign. And that we now hold in our hands the tools to make those instincts immortal—or obsolete.

That is the choice. It always has been.

The future is not something we enter.

It is something we construct.
And if we do not choose to build with clarity,
we will build with ghosts.